Hello guys so this time I will continue the discussion on my
blog and now I will discuss the new subtitles namely "Generating Initial
Motivation". Happy reading
Generating initial Motivation
The data analysis shows that students find this dimension of
generating initial motivation important in influencing their motivation in
teaching and learning process. The same result was also found on the lecturers’
perspectives on this dimension, who considered this dimension very important in
teaching and learning process.
But, there are some aspects of motivational strategies under
this dimension that are viewed differently by the students and lecturers, they
are:
The first aspect of motivational strategies is “Lecturers
regularly remind students of the accomplishment of the goal.” Based on the
students’ perspectives, this aspect of motivational strategies is considered
so-so (in total scores 338 from 500). On the other hand, lecturers categorize
this aspect of motivational strategies as ‘important’ (in total scores 22 from
30) Brophy (1998 in Dornyei, 2001, p.57) states that “The simplest way to
ensure that students expect success is to make sure that they achieve their
goal consistently”.
The second aspect of motivational strategies that is viewed
differently by the students and lecturers is referring to “Lecturers quote
positive experience of influential public figures”. For the students, this
aspect of motivational strategies is categorized as ‘so-so’ (in the total
scores 333 from 500), but the lecturers considered it very important (in total
scores 29 from 30).
Then, the third finding shows that lecturers did not use
need analysis techniques to find out their students’ needs, goals and
interests. So that, the curriculum is not based on students’ needs analysis. In
this university, the curriculum and the lesson plan were made by certain teams
without needs analysis phase. They usually worked at the beginning of the new
academic year. The teams of the curriculum and lesson plan construction were
not always the teaching team of the lesson plan that had been constructed.
Moreover, in practice, the teaching team lecturers did not implement the lesson
plan that had been made before by the team.
The last finding in this dimension shows that some lecturers
still took most of the speaking time and role in the class activities. However,
they still involved the students in at least questioning, answering, and giving
comments or opinions, even though in a smaller time portions than their
speaking time. The theory of constructivism, as cited in Lie (2008), tells us
that learning is an active, constructive process. The learner is an information
constructor. People actively construct or create their own subjective
representations of objective reality.
So that’s all my post today. I hope it can be useful for
all. Thank you
Komentar
Posting Komentar